Overview
Review Localist Events content for unclear wording, missing context, and unanswered attendee questions. This prompt starts with up to three content priorities and drafts example titles or descriptions while preserving verified event details.
AI tools change rapidly, and results are not guaranteed. Review the recommendations before making changes.
Before you start
Provide only public information or information your organization has approved for the AI tool you choose. Review any export before sharing it and remove private or internal information that is outside that approval.
| Input | What to provide |
|---|---|
| Required: organization and audiences | Identify your organization, intended attendees, and the questions they commonly ask. |
| Required: sample event content | Provide event titles, descriptions, dates, times, time zones, locations, costs, eligibility, and registration details when available. |
| Required: official event information | Add official links or pasted source material that can verify the event facts. |
| Optional: content guidance | Include approved naming conventions, style guidance, or known content limits. |
| Optional: review scope | Identify the event types, date range, or pages you want to focus on. |
You can export event examples from Admin Dashboard > Events > Live > Export CSV, or paste the content you want reviewed. The export steps are documented in Event Statuses. Include official source details needed to check each example.
How to use this prompt
- Open your preferred AI tool and add the information listed above. If the tool cannot access a link or attachment, paste the relevant text.
- Copy the entire prompt below and replace the bracketed placeholders with your information. Keep the safeguards and review instructions in the prompt.
- Submit the prompt and answer questions about missing information. Review the first recommendations before asking for another group.
Copy the prompt
Select and copy all the text in this block.
Help me improve content in our Localist Events Calendar so people can understand our events and search and AI tools can interpret the information clearly.
Briefly state what supplied content and sources you reviewed, what you could not access, and any limits on the review. Do not present a sample-based review as a complete audit.
Organization: [name]
Intended audiences and common questions: [details]
Sample event titles, descriptions and other event details: [paste or attach]
Official event information: [links or pasted text]
- Identify unclear wording, missing context, unexplained abbreviations and important attendee questions the content doesn't answer. Start with up to three impactful priorities and draft improved titles or descriptions for representative events affected by those priorities. Show the original wording, proposed revision, reason and supporting source.
- Preserve official event names and verified dates, times, time zones, locations, costs, eligibility and registration details. Don't invent missing information or accessibility accommodations. Flag conflicts for confirmation and avoid keyword stuffing.
- Separate content improvements from technical questions about indexing, structured data or crawler access that need verification. Don't guarantee search rankings or AI citations.
- Use only public or organization-approved information I provide. If you cannot access a link or upload, ask me to paste the relevant content. Ask for missing information rather than inventing facts or product capabilities. Provide recommendations for my review; don't assume you can make changes to the product. Clearly flag uncertainty and remind me to verify the output before acting.
- Finish with a checklist for confirming factual accuracy and useful attendee information before publishing.
AI tools change rapidly, and results are not guaranteed. After the first recommendations and review questions, offer to continue with up to three more recommendations and wait for my response.Review your results
- Preserve the event facts. Verify official names, dates, times, time zones, locations, costs, eligibility, and registration information against the source.
- Answer attendee questions. Check that proposed wording explains the event clearly and flags missing information without inventing details or accessibility accommodations.
- Separate technical questions. Treat claims about indexing, structured data, crawler access, search rankings, or AI citations as separate matters requiring evidence.
Use Event Submissions: Public and Admin Forms when applying approved event-content updates. Review Intro to Classification when information belongs in event classifications rather than only in the description.
Tips for Success
Keep original and proposed wording together for review. Ask the event owner to resolve conflicting facts before using a revision, and evaluate content clarity separately from actual search or AI-discovery performance.
Related prompts
Return to Start Here: Using the AI Prompt Library to choose another task.