Overview
Review your Interactive Map descriptions for unclear wording, missing context, and unanswered visitor questions. This prompt starts with up to three content priorities and drafts example revisions using the facts you provide.
AI tools change rapidly, and results are not guaranteed. Review the recommendations before making changes.
Before you start
Provide only public information or information your organization has approved for the AI tool you choose. Review any export before sharing it and remove private or internal information that is outside that approval.
| Input | What to provide |
|---|---|
| Required: organization and location | Identify the organization and geographic context so descriptions can be interpreted correctly. |
| Required: audience and questions | Explain who the content serves and what those visitors want to know. |
| Required: map content | Paste or attach location names and descriptions, or provide a location export. |
| Required: official reference information | Provide official links or pasted text that support the facts in the descriptions. |
| Optional: content guidance | Include approved terminology, length limits, or a style guide. |
See Data Export for downloading location records from the CMS. Provide pasted text if your AI tool cannot read a file or link.
How to use this prompt
- Open your preferred AI tool and add the information listed above. If the tool cannot access a link or attachment, paste the relevant text.
- Copy the entire prompt below and replace the bracketed placeholders with your information. Keep the safeguards and review instructions in the prompt.
- Submit the prompt and answer questions about missing information. Review the first recommendations before asking for another group.
Copy the prompt
Select and copy all the text in this block.
Help me improve the clarity and completeness of our Concept3D Interactive Map content for people searching for information and AI tools interpreting it.
Briefly state what supplied content and sources you reviewed, what you could not access, and any limits on the review. Do not present a sample-based review as a complete audit.
Organization and location: [details]
Primary audiences and common questions: [details]
Map location names and descriptions: [paste or attach]
Official reference information: [links or pasted text]
- Review the content for vague descriptions, unexplained abbreviations, missing context and unanswered visitor questions. Start with up to three impactful priorities, then draft improved descriptions for representative locations affected by those priorities. Show the original wording, proposed revision, reason and supporting evidence.
- Preserve official location names and verified facts. Don't invent hours, services, parking rules, accessibility details or directions. Avoid keyword stuffing.
- Keep content recommendations separate from technical questions about crawling, indexing or platform settings. Don't claim to have tested crawler access unless you actually performed and can describe that check. Don't guarantee rankings, indexing or AI citations.
- Use only public or organization-approved information I provide. If you cannot access a link or upload, ask me to paste the relevant content. Ask for missing information rather than inventing facts or product capabilities. Provide recommendations for my review; don't assume you can make changes to the product. Clearly flag uncertainty and remind me to verify the output before acting.
- Finish with a factual-review checklist before publication.
AI tools change rapidly, and results are not guaranteed. After the first recommendations and review questions, offer to continue with up to three more recommendations and wait for my response.Review your results
- Compare the facts. Check every proposed revision against the original and the official source. Preserve official names and verify any missing information.
- Read as a visitor. Confirm that the revision answers a real visitor question, explains unfamiliar terms, and avoids unnecessary keywords.
- Separate content from technical claims. Flag questions about crawling, indexing, and platform settings for verification. A clearer description does not establish improved rankings or AI citations.
Use Best Practices and Guidelines for Developing Your Map Content when reviewing descriptions. Apply approved changes through The Location Manager.
Tips for Success
Review a few representative locations first. Keep the original wording beside each proposed revision so your team can confirm what changed and why. Treat search and AI discovery as goals for useful content, not guaranteed performance outcomes.
Related prompts
Return to Start Here: Using the AI Prompt Library to choose another task. For a comparison with official source information, see Use AI to Find Outdated Map Content.